Volume 25, Issue 91 (fall 2020 2020)                   __Judicial Law Views __2012__, 25(__59__): __224196 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

aziziyani M. challenges of comparing the conditions to match the accuracy of contracts in terms of conditions and the arbitration agreement. دیدگاه‌های حقوقی 2020; 25 (91) :179-196
URL: http://jlviews2.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-1815-en.html
University of Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services , majidaziziyani@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1380 Views)
comparing the conditions to match the accuracy of contracts in terms of conditions and the arbitration agreement
In the Code of Civil Procedure no definition is offered of arbitration, but paragraph C of article one of the code of arbitration in international commerce has offered a definition if it. Arbitration agreement is contract and agreement by and between parties throughout which the manner of resolving the upcoming or current disputes is bestowed on a third party for arbitration except for judicial courts. Proviso  falls under the category of the term contract which is inserted in the beginning of the article 190 of the mentioned code because it is intended by and is mutually agreed by the parties and the two parties by free will write it to establish this condition. Within the domain of the term transaction which stands at the top of the mentioned article 190.The condition of arbitrations an independent condition, despite its appearance which is a proviso, is that it has an independent essence and is valid and in terms of independence is considered as an independent legal act such as contracts
Full-Text [PDF 576 kb]   (937 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable Research | Subject: Pivate Law
Received: 2019/12/15 | Revised: 2021/08/14 | Accepted: 2020/12/16 | Published: 2020/10/06 | ePublished: 2020/10/06

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Judicial Law Views Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb