Volume 27, Issue 97 (spring 2022)
__Judicial Law Views __2012__, 27(__59__): __224231 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
karimi A, ebrahimi D. The law of the status quo is based on the transaction authorized by the debtor. دیدگاههای حقوقی 2022; 27 (97) :213-231
URL: http://jlviews2.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-2054-en.html
URL: http://jlviews2.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-2054-en.html
1- , ebrahimi.davood1@gmail.com
Abstract: (814 Views)
Can the legal status of the centers be decided by the brother of the transaction to the debtor? Observance of jurisprudence in suspended, ineffective and non-penetrating meanings is a waste of time and great ideas of reluctance. Observance of legal status, validity of two pillars is permissible, in the sense that he has the right to be responsible for the elements mentioned in Article 190 of the full Civil Code, but the property of care is non- property without protest.
in a compliant contract, a third party's permission is neither a condition nor a part of the transaction. The mortgagor's consent causes the mortgagor's right to fall and constitutes a mortgage, which means the removal of barriers. The rejection of the mortgaged transaction by the mortgagor also does not mean that the mortgagor insists on the survival of his right and does not constitute invalidity. Acceptance and consent of the mortgagor does not mean the sale of the property owed by the mortgagor to the third party.
The aforementioned jurisprudential arguments and the approval of Article 62 of the Law on Permanent Judgments of the Development Programs of the country, approved in 2016, have allocated the unity vote of procedure 620 of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court. The above are clear indications and strong reasons for considering the legal status of the merchant (the sum of the legal status of validity and invalid) on the transaction to be owed to the property
in a compliant contract, a third party's permission is neither a condition nor a part of the transaction. The mortgagor's consent causes the mortgagor's right to fall and constitutes a mortgage, which means the removal of barriers. The rejection of the mortgaged transaction by the mortgagor also does not mean that the mortgagor insists on the survival of his right and does not constitute invalidity. Acceptance and consent of the mortgagor does not mean the sale of the property owed by the mortgagor to the third party.
The aforementioned jurisprudential arguments and the approval of Article 62 of the Law on Permanent Judgments of the Development Programs of the country, approved in 2016, have allocated the unity vote of procedure 620 of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court. The above are clear indications and strong reasons for considering the legal status of the merchant (the sum of the legal status of validity and invalid) on the transaction to be owed to the property
Type of Study: Applicable Research |
Subject:
Pivate Law
Received: 2021/07/03 | Revised: 2023/01/21 | Accepted: 2021/12/18 | Published: 2022/06/18 | ePublished: 2022/06/18
Received: 2021/07/03 | Revised: 2023/01/21 | Accepted: 2021/12/18 | Published: 2022/06/18 | ePublished: 2022/06/18
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
