Volume 19, Issue 67 (Autumn 2014 2014)
__Judicial Law Views __2012__, 19(__59__): __224132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
sarduoienasab M, samavatipour M. Necessity of award s delivery. دیدگاههای حقوقی 2014; 19 (67) :103-132
URL: http://jlviews2.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-573-en.html
URL: http://jlviews2.ujsas.ac.ir/article-1-573-en.html
1- Tehran University , sarduoienasab@ut.ac.ir
2- Tehran University
2- Tehran University
Abstract: (11469 Views)
According to the new rules of civil procedure of Iran, if the verdict of an arbitrator be issued and delivered after the arbitration s period, it is void and won’t be executable. Thus every one of arbitration s party can ask the court to rescind the award. This subject caused many disagreements among lawyers .Some lawyers believe if the issue and delivery happen after determinate period for arbitration, it is void. But if an arbitrator makes his award during the time of arbitration and delivers it after period, it is valid and correct. In contrast to this view some other lawyers argue delivery of verdict after termination of arbitration s time is equal to issue of it after period .In this article, we will see that for some reason there is no possibility for an arbitrator to prove the opposite of this subject. In this article we will follow second opinion
Type of Study: Applicable Research |
Subject:
Pivate Law
Received: 2015/03/24 | Revised: 2019/02/06 | Accepted: 2015/04/06 | Published: 2015/04/26 | ePublished: 2015/04/26
Received: 2015/03/24 | Revised: 2019/02/06 | Accepted: 2015/04/06 | Published: 2015/04/26 | ePublished: 2015/04/26
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
